Friday, April 24, 2009

Sampling Lake Michigan

The Blue Water Task Force is now exploring the Great Lakes. The newly-founded Lake Michigan Chapter has hit the ground running, raising funds through a grant from the Norcross Wildlife Foundation and raffles to perform a water testing program in the ice-free, off-season months of Sept.- Dec. and March- May. Their water testing program is being implemented in partnership with the GVSU’s Annis Water Resource Institute (AWRI). AWRI Biologist and SFLMC member Matt Cooper is leading this ‘first of its kind" study to investigate water quality in Lake Michigan during the months when surfers are most likely to be in the water. Water quality data and more information can be found on the Lake Michigan Chapter's website.

The following Q&A with Matt discusses the highlights of the beach monitoring program.

Q - Tell us about the current water testing program, what is the overall objective?
M - We’re testing the water at the popular surf breaks on both sides of the Grand Haven channel. We’re looking for E. coli and Enterococcus because these bacteria are indicators of other pathogens that can make people sick. The Ottawa County Health Department does a great job of testing the beaches from Memorial Day to Labor Day but we tend to surf a lot more during the Spring, Fall, and Winter so we decided to take matters into our own hands and start our own testing program to make sure we aren’t surfing in contaminated water.

Q - What can you tell us that you have learned so far? (ie does temperature affect ecoli, turbulence, etc).
M - Well, so far, we can say that the water around Grand Haven has had pretty low bacteria counts, especially when the water is really cold. This has been a nice surprise since we really had no idea what we would find in the Fall, after the Health Dept. finishes their sampling for the year.

Q - Does the data collected so far confirm or deny your initial theories on water quality in GH?
M - Since the project focuses on ‘surf days,’ which also tend to be the rainy and nasty days with a lot of muddy runoff in the river, I expected to see more high bacteria counts than what we’ve found. Of course, this is good news for all of us who spend time in the water.

Q - Can we make any conclusions at this time based on the rain events last fall?
M - We’re going to continue testing while we still have funding but so far, we have no reason to think that the water is too polluted to surf. We’re blessed with a beautiful beach, a lot of Spring and Fall surf, and it appears that water quality is pretty good as well.

Q - What does the data mean?
M - To determine whether we are exposing ourselves to nasty ‘bugs’ (bacteria, viruses, etc.) associated with human waste when we’re surfing and kiteboarding at the Grand Haven and Ferrysburg breaks, we are testing for E. coli, and Enterococci. These particular bacteria are found in the digestive tracts of humans and, in fact, they generally don’t cause us any harm (it’s not the same strain of E. coli that makes us sick). However, when we find them in high numbers at the beach, it’s a pretty good indication that other nasty pathogens are present which could make us sick. We will be collecting water samples on most ‘surfable’ or ‘kiteable’ days from now until the ice sets in. We’ll pick it up again after the ice is gone in the spring. Sampling locations include the Grand Haven State Park and north of the pier on the Ferrysburg side.

The numbers that we will report are ‘Colony Forming Units’ (CFU) per 100 milliliters. You can think of this as the number of viable bacteria cells in a 100 milliliter sample. For E. coli, as long as the number stays below 300 CFU per 100 ml for a single day, there’s little cause for concern. For Enterococci, as long as the numbers stay below 104 CFU per 100 ml it’s safe to surf. Of course, these numbers are merely thresholds that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has established for recreational waters. This does not mean that at 275 E. coli CFU there’s no chance of getting sick or at 325 CFU you will contract every nasty ailment known to man. The number that we will report are geometric means (a type of average) of at least 3 separate samples collected in approximately 3 to 4 foot of water. We are also collecting additional data including water temperature, wave height, longshore current, weather conditions, and the number of people in the water.

This program was funded in part (roughly two-thirds) by a grant from the Norcross Wildlife Foundation and by you, the local surfers (roughly one-third). Pathogen monitoring has been contracted to the Annis Water Resources Institute of Grand Valley State University. For additional information, contact Matt Cooper (616-331-8790,

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Filling in Financial Shortfalls

Economic hardship has become a reality in communities across the country and around the world. Governments and NGOs alike are being told to do more with less, or unfortunately sometimes, just to do less. State and county health and environmental agencies are not immune to this trend. Budget restrictions are forcing them to pare down their beach water quality monitoring programs by cutting back on the number of beaches tested and the frequency of sampling. Even in California and Florida, two states where beaches drive huge, tourism-based, economic engines, beach monitoring programs have been threatened with major cuts in funding. While the Surfrider Foundation will continue to submit requests for increased federal funding of the BEACH Act so more money gets to coastal states for water testing, our chapters are already taking action to fill in the gaps left by government-run beach monitoring programs.

In Mendocino County, California, the Department of Environmental Health began water quality testing in 2004 at selected beaches frequented by recreational users. Many of these test sites, however, were mainly dive locations and were seldom used by surfers. Additionally, testing was generally conducted only during the summer when there’s little swell.

With this in mind, the Mendocino Chapter proposed additional test sites to the County, including beaches that are primarily used by surfers and beach goers, and to increase the sampling period into the winter months. Since funding is always a problem for the small county, the Chapter proposed to conduct the additional testing on a volunteer basis by Mendocino Chapter members. Thus the Mendocino Chapter Blue Water Task Force was created.

Since 2006, their stout and intrepid team (Victoria Kraus, Jackie Dooley, and Jack Coulumbe) has collected water samples for bacteria testing on a bi-weekly basis at seven locations throughout Mendocino County. In times of County funding shortfalls they have actually substituted for County employees, all on their own time.

In Oregon, the newly founded Siuslaw Chapter, in partnership with the Siuslaw Watershed Council, has launched their Blue Water Task Force program this past winter season. Chapter members collect monthly water samples in areas around Florence that aren’t currently monitored by the State Beach Monitoring program. Volunteers collect samples at the South jetty, North jetty, the Siuslaw River and, the Heceta beach drainage near Driftwood Shores. Larry Brammer designed and built the device that attaches to a fishing pole to hold the water sample bottles when collecting water from the ocean. The water samples are brought to the Siuslaw Watershed Council laboratory in Mapleton for analysis.

The Mendocino and Siuslaw Chapters’ Blue Water Task Force are a great example of volunteerism in support of the community.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Surfrider Europe's Bathing Waters Program

Surfrider Europe’s Bathing Waters program is a surveillance network complimentary to existing water testing programs that communicates information on coastal water quality throughout the year. As the quality of our bathing water is more and more under threat, Surfrider Foundation Europe is taking action to arm users of the coastline with better information and to ensure that water sports enthusiasts are not forgotten.

So far, Surfrider has set up three independent laboratories to better understand the pollution problems of the coastlines, focusing on beaches that are not considered ‘bathing water’ by the 2006 directive that drives water quality testing in these regions.

Beach water quality data from the Bilboa and Marseilles laboratories are available online. Surfrider has plans to expand their water testing program with three additional labs yet to open.

The Bathing Waters program provides clear, water quality information valuable to those practicing nautical activities. Surfrider Europe is also using this program as a base of dialogue with local authorities to encourage the government to expand their program to protect beaches that are enjoyed by sport enthusiasts (surfing, sailing, kite boarding, windsurfing) as well as traditional ‘bathing beaches’. Learn more about this program and Surfrider Europe's other initiatives on their website.